ANALISIS FRAMING MEDIA ONLINE REPUBLIKA.CO.ID DAN KOMPAS.COM TERHADAP SIKAP B.O.P (BOARD OF PEACE) DALAM KASUS GENOSIDA PALESTINA 2026

Abstrak

Eskalasi konflik Israel-Palestina di Jalur Gaza sejak 2023 hingga 2026 menimbulkan krisis kemanusiaan besar dan tuduhan genosida dari komunitas internasional. Sebagai respons, dibentuk forum Board of Peace (BoP) yang turut diikuti Indonesia, namun keberadaannya menuai pro-kontra karena dinilai berpotensi menjadi alat kepentingan politik negara besar dan belum tegas menekan Israel. Perdebatan ini banyak dibingkai oleh media massa, termasuk Republika.co.id sebagai media dengan identitas keislaman kuat yang konsisten mengangkat isu Palestina. Penelitian ini menganalisis bagaimana Republika.co.id membingkai sikap BoP dalam pemberitaan genosida Palestina menggunakan model framing Robert N. Entman (define problems, diagnose causes, make moral judgement, suggest remedies). Hasil awal menunjukkan Republika.co.id cenderung mempertanyakan efektivitas dan keberpihakan BoP, dengan menonjolkan aspek kemanusiaan serta kekhawatiran bahwa forum tersebut menggeser fokus dari kemerdekaan Palestina ke kepentingan politik global.

The escalation of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in the Gaza Strip between 2023 and 2026 has triggered a major humanitarian crisis and allegations of genocide from the international community. In response, the Board of Peace (BoP) forum was established with Indonesia participating yet its existence has sparked controversy; critics argue it risks becoming a tool for the political interests of major powers and has failed to exert firm pressure on Israel. This debate has been extensively framed by mass media, including Republika.co.id, an outlet with a strong Islamic identity that consistently highlights the Palestinian cause. This study analyzes how Republika.co.id frames the BoP’s stance regarding the genocide in Palestine, utilizing Robert N. Entman’s framing model (defining problems, diagnosing causes, making moral judgments, and suggesting remedies). Preliminary findings indicate that Republika.co.id tends to question the BoP’s effectiveness and impartiality, emphasizing humanitarian concerns and the apprehension that the forum shifts the focus away from Palestinian independence toward global political interests.